Medical Liars Lying About Medicine

We are constantly being told that we can trust the medical research that is published in peer-reviewed journals. This is the ‘evidence’ for Evidence-Based Medicine. The gold standard of proof for safety and effectiveness of all currently used drugs, vaccines and surgical procedures. But most of this information is not backed by real evidence. And much of it is overly-influenced by the drug companies that produce and profit from the treatment in question.

Here, John Rappoport gives an excellent critique of how this sort of mass-deception is allowed to occur and why our regulators turn a blind eye to the terrible, almost overwhelming, toll this takes on our population.

Medical Liars Lying About Medicine


“It is simply no longer possible to believe much of the clinical research that is published, or to rely on the judgment of trusted physicians or authoritative medical guidelines. I take no pleasure in this conclusion, which I reached slowly and reluctantly over my two decades as an editor of The New England Journal of Medicine.”

Marcia Angell, MD

“The secret of acting is sincerity. If you can fake that, you’ve got it made.” — George Burns

In light of my recent release of THE MATRIX REVEALED, the information in this piece takes on special meaning. The faking of medical reality is, at bottom, an operation designed to bolster the power of the medical cartel, one of the most important forces on the planet.

What do doctors rely on? What do medical schools rely on? What do medical journals and mainstream medical reporters and drug companies and the FDA rely on?

The sanctity of published clinical trials of drugs. These trials determine whether the drugs are safe and effective. The drugs are tested on human volunteers. The results are tabulated. The trial is described in a paper that is printed by a medical journal.

This is science. This is rationality. This is the rock. Without these studies, the whole field of medical research would fall apart in utter chaos.

Jon Rappoport's Blog

Medical liars lying about medicine

Inventing medical reality

by Jon Rappoport

May 19, 2012

Breaking News:Click here to access all the articles on this FDA Genocide Murder news story.


Now that I’ve shown the FDA is completely aware their approved medical drugs are killing 100,000 Americans a year, we move to the next fact:

They’re also aware that hundreds and thousands of published studies are FAKE. Why? Because those studies “proved” THE DRUGS WERE SAFE.

See how the crime proliferates?

Analogy: During a murder trial, a witness claims he saw the defendant at the time of the murder eating ice cream on the other side of town, and he talked to the defendant and they went bowling—but later in the trial, the prosecution unveils a video showing the defendant shooting the victim. Therefore, the witness was committing perjury. Everybody knows that.

That’s what we have here…

View original post 1,632 more words

6 thoughts on “Medical Liars Lying About Medicine

  1. Hey australiansceptics. You cannot publish stuff like this. Its true.

    You see the reason why Matthew Carey’s LeftBrainRightBrain and Dr David Gorski’s Respectful Insolence blogs get all their groupie hangers on commenting is because pretty much none of what they publish is true. They provoke controversy by making palpably false claims.

    The groupie hangers on then pile in for sport. They enjoy it.

    So the problem for them here, you see, is that they know they are going to lose the argument and they cannot then apply their usual tricks – like deleting information from submission which prove them wrong or not posting submission and their all time favourite which is not publishing replies and then pretending the other person cannot and piling in criticising them. That is Matthew Carey’s #1 fallback and his groupies never let him down.

    Is there a psychiatric term for that kind of thing?

    • Clifford, sites like Respectful Insolence and LBRB don’t moderate comments – anyone critical of them can have their say.
      Yet here and with every other antivaccine blog I have ever encountered (including your own), censorship of dissenting views and moderation is ruthlessly exercised, and critical comments stand little hope of getting through.

      Now why do you think that might be?

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s